Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...

Chinowsky, P S, Diekmann, J and O’Brien, J (2010) Project Organizations as Social Networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 452–8.

Dossick, C S and Neff, G (2010) Organizational Divisions in BIM-Enabled Commercial Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 459–67.

Garvin, M J (2010) Enabling Development of the Transportation Public-Private Partnership Market in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 402–11.

Harty, C and Whyte, J (2010) Emerging Hybrid Practices in Construction Design Work: Role of Mixed Media. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 468–76.

Javernick-Will, A and Levitt, R E (2010) Mobilizing Institutional Knowledge for International Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 430–41.

Mahalingam, A (2010) PPP Experiences in Indian Cities: Barriers, Enablers, and the Way Forward. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 419–29.

Vives, A, Benavides, J and Paris, A M (2010) Selecting Infrastructure Delivery Modalities: No Time for Ideology or Semantics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 412–8.

Wong, K, Unsal, H, Taylor, J E and Levitt, R E (2010) Global Dimension of Robust Project Network Design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(04), 442–51.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Organizations; Project management; Design; Simulation; Uncertainty principles; Construction industry; Global; Organizations; Project management; Project networks; Robust design; Simulation; Uncertainty;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000143
  • Abstract:
    Managing the increased complexity, emerging uncertainties, and diversity of cultures on global projects is creating significant challenges for architecture, engineering, and construction firms. In global projects, differences in “institutions”—including language, beliefs, values, group norms, work practices, professional roles, industry organizations, and legal frameworks—among team members from different national backgrounds can lead to misunderstanding and conflicts that cause delays, increase costs, and reduce quality. Previous research has examined risk factors associated with international project execution. However, little research to date has explored whether reconfiguring project networks might mitigate such risks. Project organizational simulation tools have been combined with “robust design” experimental techniques to design robust project networks that can perform reliably in uncertain conditions. This paper extends project network design research to examine whether robust designs for given project networks differ between “domestic” and “global” projects, given differing organizational uncertainties. The results demonstrate that robust project network designs may differ for global project networks. This finding has significant implications for the design of project networks in an industry where firm participation in global project networks is increasing, both domestically and abroad.